Forum

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: incorrections  (Read 2869 times)
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« on: January 16, 2013, 08:20:49 PM »

This a comment for this page on the website
There are several incorrections in the review. For example sharpness (P-Mpix) score is confused with overall DXomark Score.

For example:
Attached to the APS-C sensored EOS 7D, the EF300mm f/2.8L IS USM once again puts in a strong performance, scoring 16.7P-Mpix, relative to the EOS 7D’s resolution of 18megapixels. Equally, the Pentax lens scores very well, managing 15.0P-Mpix compared to the 16.3megapixels available on the K-5. Overall, this shows the EF300mm f/2.8L IS USM is as good as it’s made out to be, but in this comparison, the Pentax on a K-5 is not that far behind.

EF300mm f/2.8L IS USM + 7D =11P-Mpix not 16.7P-Mpix as mentioned.
DA Star 300mm f/4 ED (IF) SDM + Pentax K-5=only 7P-Mpix not 15.
Logged
Nicolas
Global Moderator
Full Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 127


« Reply #1 on: January 18, 2013, 11:28:05 AM »

Hello,

There was indeed a mistake.

This part was only talking about DxOMark score.


Thanks a lot for letting us know, it should now be corrected.

Best regards,

Logged
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2013, 11:03:49 AM »

Furthermore in the review of Canon EF-S 18-135mm f3.5-f5.6 IS STM lens

In comparison section:

Quote
Tested on the flagship APS-C DSLRs from Canon and Nikon, the 7D and D7000, these two Super Zooms achieve remarkably similar results. Overall we can say they’re the same optically although the Nikon version hits a DxOMark Score of 13 just nudging out the Canon with 12.


The screenshot shows us not D7000 but D300 with the score 10 not 13 as mentioned.

Logged
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2013, 05:36:31 PM »

Error in screenshot

What does it mean "Not available"?

Logged
Emilie_DxOMark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2013, 12:02:56 PM »

Hello,

Thanks for noticing the mistake. This is now corrected!

Best,

Logged
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2013, 05:22:52 PM »

There is no line for EOS M but it is mentioned in legend in Samsung NX200 review.
Logged
Emilie_DxOMark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2013, 04:55:39 PM »

Hello,

Thanks for letting us know. This is now corrected.

Best regards,

Emilie
Logged
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #7 on: March 02, 2013, 03:39:15 PM »

This is now corrected.
The screenshot remained the same. I didn't see any corrections done.
Logged
Emilie_DxOMark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #8 on: March 04, 2013, 10:55:53 AM »

Hello!

Sorry! Now this is (normally) corrected.

Thanks again for letting us know about this error!

Best regards,

The DxOMark team
Logged
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2013, 05:57:08 PM »

Quote
When it comes to the camera technology, HTC has been even bolder and in the midst of camera phone megapixel race, with 12 or 13-megapixels becoming the norm for new flagship Smartphones, the HTC One utilizes a 1/3” sensor with just a 4-megpixel 2688x1520 pixel resolution.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2013, 05:58:44 PM by Toshik » Logged
Emilie_DxOMark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #10 on: March 15, 2013, 10:14:26 AM »

Hello!

Thank you for noticing the error. It is now corrected.

Best regards,

The DxOMark team
Logged
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2013, 11:09:11 AM »

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 200-400mm f/4GED review:

First of all thank you for review.

1).Add space between F/4G and ED in title of review.

2).In paragraph:
Quote
As one would hope for a lens costing a cool $7,000, the AF-S Nikkor 200-400mm f/4G ED VR II performs well, achieving an overall DxOMark Score of 25. Sharpness isn’t up to the fixed focal length equivalents (which vary from 28-25P-Mpix over the same range) but it has very good sharpness across the frame at full aperture throughout the zoom range, though peak performance is at 250mm f/4.

28-25 is actually a DxOMark score, but not sharpness score (which is 17P-Mpix).

« Last Edit: July 28, 2013, 12:13:57 PM by Toshik » Logged
Emilie_DxOMark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #12 on: July 30, 2013, 10:15:49 AM »

Hello!

Thanks for your interest in DxOMark. Here are some explanations on the following sentence:

« Sharpness isn’t up to the fixed focal length equivalents (which vary from 28-25P-Mpix over the same range) but it has very good sharpness across the frame at full aperture throughout the zoom range, though peak performance is at 250mm f/4”

What we mean is that the 200mm f/2 prime has a sharpness score of 28 P-Mpix and the 400mm f/2,8 prime has 25 (on a D800), to be compared with the 17 P-Mpix of the 200-400mm f/4.
Our apologies if it’s no clear on our review.

Best regards,

The DxOMark team
Logged
Toshik
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



« Reply #13 on: September 15, 2013, 09:18:30 AM »

From Pentax K-500 review:

Correct the following:

1). While the lithium ion battery and chargercan be bought separately.
« Last Edit: September 15, 2013, 09:20:21 AM by Toshik » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines