MOST RELEVANT RESULT(S) FOR :

Author Topic: Better than the Canikon?  (Read 2199 times)

Offline ronnbot

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Better than the Canikon?
« on: May 07, 2013, 04:36:43 am »
This a comment for this page on the website
Interesting comparison. Why not compare to similar lenses in other format like what was done with the 35-100/2.8?

Anyway, this lens is a good one. It has better overall score than both Canon and Nikon 17-55/2.8 with better sharpness and CA than the Canon and better transmission and vignetting than both:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Lenses/Compare-Camera-Lenses/Compare-lenses/(lens1)/173/(brand)/Nikkor/(camera1)/0/(lens2)/960/(brand2)/Panasonic/(camera2)/0/(lens3)/169/(brand3)/Canon/(camera3)/0

Offline sflxn

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Better than the Canikon?
« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2013, 03:29:00 am »
First, get a clue about which lens to compare with.  Pana 35-100 needs to be compared with 70-200/2.8 from Canon and Nikon on a FF sensor.  The dinky m43 lens isn't in the same universe as the Canon and Nikon equivalent.

Offline sflxn

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Better than the Canikon?
« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2013, 06:20:56 am »
My bad.  I saw the comments from the 'Forums' page.  It didn't have a link back to the lens page you were commenting about.  I just saw 35-100 and assumed you were talking about that lens.  Now, I know you're talking about the 12-35 lens.  The forums page is very poorly done on this site.