Forum

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Better than the Canikon?  (Read 713 times)
ronnbot
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« on: May 07, 2013, 04:36:43 AM »

This a comment for this page on the website
Interesting comparison. Why not compare to similar lenses in other format like what was done with the 35-100/2.8?

Anyway, this lens is a good one. It has better overall score than both Canon and Nikon 17-55/2.8 with better sharpness and CA than the Canon and better transmission and vignetting than both:
http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Lenses/Compare-Camera-Lenses/Compare-lenses/(lens1)/173/(brand)/Nikkor/(camera1)/0/(lens2)/960/(brand2)/Panasonic/(camera2)/0/(lens3)/169/(brand3)/Canon/(camera3)/0
Logged
sflxn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2013, 03:29:00 AM »

First, get a clue about which lens to compare with.  Pana 35-100 needs to be compared with 70-200/2.8 from Canon and Nikon on a FF sensor.  The dinky m43 lens isn't in the same universe as the Canon and Nikon equivalent.
Logged
sflxn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #2 on: May 12, 2013, 06:20:56 AM »

My bad.  I saw the comments from the 'Forums' page.  It didn't have a link back to the lens page you were commenting about.  I just saw 35-100 and assumed you were talking about that lens.  Now, I know you're talking about the 12-35 lens.  The forums page is very poorly done on this site.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: