Forum

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: amateurish test  (Read 607 times)
darrask
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« on: September 17, 2013, 09:48:27 PM »

This a comment for this page on the website
Everything was controlled: lighting, test shot, camera setup...

It's a bit strange to see a reputed "image science" lab making such tests with a simple sheet of paper, which is sometimes unevenly lighted, with irregular detail (not symmetric) and held quite unsteadily and manually by the tester.

You should have used a test chart mounted on a rack to keep up your reputation of scientific accuracy.
Logged
darrask
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 25


« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2013, 09:50:08 PM »

I meant the video AF tracking test.
Logged
ingloryon
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2013, 03:48:23 AM »

Not ideal things for the test... every real-world situations are not ideal either. Seems perfect to me.
Logged
sim62
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10


« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2013, 08:06:38 PM »

Not ideal things for the test... every real-world situations are not ideal either. Seems perfect to me.
This is a COMPARISON, not a real-world situation.
Logged
Emilie_DxOMark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2013, 10:30:26 AM »

Hello!

Thanks for your interest in DxOMark.

Most of the time, DxOMark provides number, on this specific topic the choice was only to provide a simple but challenging test and compare very quickly both systems.
This test was only for fun and we did not measure anything and did not provide any score  Smiley

Best regards,

The DxOMark team
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: