MOST RELEVANT RESULT(S) FOR :


Author Topic: amateurish test  (Read 2533 times)

Offline darrask

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
amateurish test
« on: September 17, 2013, 09:48:27 pm »
This a comment for this page on the website
Everything was controlled: lighting, test shot, camera setup...

It's a bit strange to see a reputed "image science" lab making such tests with a simple sheet of paper, which is sometimes unevenly lighted, with irregular detail (not symmetric) and held quite unsteadily and manually by the tester.

You should have used a test chart mounted on a rack to keep up your reputation of scientific accuracy.

Offline darrask

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 26
Re: amateurish test
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2013, 09:50:08 pm »
I meant the video AF tracking test.

Offline ingloryon

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: amateurish test
« Reply #2 on: September 18, 2013, 03:48:23 am »
Not ideal things for the test... every real-world situations are not ideal either. Seems perfect to me.

Offline sim62

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
Re: amateurish test
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2013, 08:06:38 pm »
Not ideal things for the test... every real-world situations are not ideal either. Seems perfect to me.
This is a COMPARISON, not a real-world situation.

Offline Emilie_DxOMark

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: amateurish test
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2013, 10:30:26 am »
Hello!

Thanks for your interest in DxOMark.

Most of the time, DxOMark provides number, on this specific topic the choice was only to provide a simple but challenging test and compare very quickly both systems.
This test was only for fun and we did not measure anything and did not provide any score  :)

Best regards,

The DxOMark team