MOST RELEVANT RESULT(S) FOR :


Author Topic: Why do you not split the best lenses test as usually common on DXOmark?  (Read 3862 times)

Offline Zenmonk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Dear DXOmark team,

why do you not split the best lenses test more detailed for the D7100 as usually common (e.g. D800, D600)?? Instead of just two categories prime and zoom lenses, you could use similar to other "best lenses test" ultra-/wide angle, standard, super/-telephoto lenses??

I also miss a couple of major and interesting lenses such as the Sigma 8-16 4.5-5.6, Nikon 10-24 3.5-4.5G (two quite popular uww lenses), Nikon 16-85 3.5.-5.6G (best/better alternative to the 17-55 2.8?), Nikon 28 1.8 (maybe the interesting standard prime/ focal length for dx?),Nikon 50 1.4, Nikon 50 1.8, Nikon 10.5 2.8 Fisheye, Nikon 70-300 4.5-5.6G.......

Do their absence of listing mean that they are too bad in terms of performance, sharpness... ?

Thank you in advance for answering!

Best regards,
« Last Edit: October 06, 2013, 11:09:59 am by Zenmonk »

Offline Emilie_DxOMark

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 530
Re: Why do you not split the best lenses test as usually common on DXOmark?
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2013, 03:05:04 pm »
Hello,


Thanks for your kind support.

We hope you noticed your wish was exhausted :). Some other parts followed.

Best regards,

The DxOMark team