Forum

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: evaluation unserious  (Read 793 times)
ag08025
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 36


« on: October 14, 2013, 03:29:14 PM »

This a comment for this page on the website
how is it that your assessment is equal to that of the EF 200-400 L IS USM?
Because what I see in the site: "http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=764&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=1&API=0&LensComp=704&CameraComp=614&SampleComp=0&FLIComp=1&APIComp=0" is so different?
Logged
Emilie_DxOMark
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 530


« Reply #1 on: October 22, 2013, 09:11:37 AM »

Hello,


Thanks for your feedback. The comparison you linked was performed with other cameras (Canon EOS 1Ds Mark III and Nikon D3x). Here is the comparison on dxomark.com : http://www.dxomark.com/Lenses/Compare-Camera-Lenses/Compare-lenses/%28lens1%29/1161/%28lens2%29/409/%28brand1%29/Canon/%28camera1%29/436/%28brand2%29/Nikkor/%28camera2%29/485
One other important point is the difference between RAW files analysis as we do and RGB final picture. Depending on the raw conversion, results can vary significantly.

Best regards,

The DxOMark team
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines