Forum

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: also dpreview find 70-200 2,8 IS MK2 better  (Read 3141 times)
macrobild
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« on: September 22, 2011, 12:04:48 AM »

This a comment for this page on the website
http://www.dpreview.com/lensreviews/canon_70-200_2p8_is_usm_ii_c16/page6.asp
Logged
PHOTOUK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #1 on: September 22, 2011, 05:35:06 PM »

Yes, this is strange. Professionals like the DXO staff do not make errors like this so I can only think that the subject lens used for the review was suspect.

I have had both of these lenses and found the MKII to be better by quite a margin on Contrast, Sharpness and AF Speed.

These results are quite a surprise to me as I was expecting them to be amongst the best in any class.

Am I kidding myself, is this lens really that bad? I don't think so.  Undecided

What is the answer?
Logged
macrobild
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #2 on: September 22, 2011, 08:55:18 PM »

Yes, this is strange. Professionals like the DXO staff do not make errors like this so I can only think that the subject lens used for the review was suspect.

I have had both of these lenses and found the MKII to be better by quite a margin on Contrast, Sharpness and AF Speed.

These results are quite a surprise to me as I was expecting them to be amongst the best in any class.

Am I kidding myself, is this lens really that bad? I don't think so.  Undecided

What is the answer?

yes
i think they (DXO) had a bad copy of the lens
Logged
Sergi Gabriel
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1



« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2012, 04:29:00 PM »

I think if change resolution test from 70-200 2,8 IS MK2 to 70-200 2,8 IS II MK2, then it will be true.  Grin  

Second version of 70-200 2,8 L IS is realy good.  Grin

It is missinfg of DXO-Mark...  Roll Eyes
  
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: