301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently


nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)
301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently


nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)

Author Topic: This test really calls into question the validity of DXOMark lens tests  (Read 3947 times)

Offline thunng8

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
This a comment for this page on the website
I own this lens on FF and it is much sharper than the first version.  Every single site that has reviewed this lens says it is better.  All over the forums, internet, even Canon data (MTF charts etc) says this lens is better.

After reading the review of this lens on this site, I have to call into question the validity of this test.  Also after seeing such result that is so out of whack compared to other lens testers, I just have to call into question the validity of the whole DXOMark lens test site.

Offline Simen1

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 58
Re: This test really calls into question the validity of DXOMark lens tests
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2012, 03:52:39 pm »
Bad sample?

Offline thunng8

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
Re: This test really calls into question the validity of DXOMark lens tests
« Reply #2 on: February 10, 2012, 06:46:24 am »
Bad sample?

If it was a bad sample, DXO should have got another sample of the lens and retested it.  That is what all other respectable lens test sites do.

 

301 Moved Permanently

301 Moved Permanently


nginx/1.4.6 (Ubuntu)