Forum

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Where is OM-D E-M5 Review?  (Read 3704 times)
Hakeem
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 39



« on: September 19, 2012, 05:54:12 PM »

This a comment for this page on the website
Thanks for the extensive test on yet to release camera, but  where is already released and extremely popular OMD?
Logged

Hakeem - A Soft Coder
@ Flickr
Pany GH1, GF3, Oly Pen-EP1, XZ-1, Nikon D5100
Interested in Sony A580, Nikon J1
Waiting for Oly XZ-2, Pany GH3, Nikon D800/ Canon 5D-III
DXOMARK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19


« Reply #1 on: September 19, 2012, 10:42:14 PM »

The first camera they test is Nikon D600 !   DUH !

Whatever happened to Olympus OMD EM5 ?

Very strange.  Perhaps DXOMARKS is indeed having some spite with Olympus !

 Huh Embarrassed
Logged
jyhfeei
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2012, 01:53:28 AM »

The first camera they test is Nikon D600 !   DUH !

Whatever happened to Olympus OMD EM5 ?

Very strange.  Perhaps DXOMARKS is indeed having some spite with Olympus !

 Huh Embarrassed

Supposedly the Olympus was tested months ago, but DXO won't release the results.  The Olympus modified Sony sensor must have tested too good.

Now, how about testing another "tried and true" Canon or Panasonic sensor.  Makes those Sony/Nikon sensors look good, you know. Grin
Logged
cocute
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19


« Reply #3 on: September 21, 2012, 02:00:55 PM »

Lastest Olympus and Fuji cameras are banned in Dxomark,
Only appear brands are paying for good rank.
« Last Edit: September 21, 2012, 03:28:51 PM by cocute » Logged
randybenter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


« Reply #4 on: September 21, 2012, 08:49:07 PM »

I've always thought of DXO as a site for fair and unbiased testing. But, I agree that their credibility is now falling fast. If they are going to focus on certain brands (Sony, Nikon, Lumix) and avoid other brands (Fuji, Olympus), then they need to post a news story that justifies their selection process. Their continued silence regarding the X-Pro 1 and E-M5 can only hurt their credibility.
Logged
jyhfeei
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


« Reply #5 on: September 22, 2012, 01:38:20 AM »

If they are going to focus on certain brands (Sony, Nikon, Lumix) and avoid other brands (Fuji, Olympus), then they need to post a news story that justifies their selection process. Their continued silence regarding the X-Pro 1 and E-M5 can only hurt their credibility.

DXO screens the results.  To make sponsors happy?  Not really RAW data?  The way they are screening in silence makes it look like the former.  Especially when high performing Nikon/Sony sensors get such high priority.  Average performers from Canon, Pany and Oly are also quickly posted.  Not one 4/3 sensor was missed until the OM-D.

The data silence is especially ridiculous on the Fuji sensor as it is quite a unique design and from what I see, competes with FF sensors.  Wouldn't you figure this sort of data would be interesting to a sensor testing lab?


« Last Edit: September 22, 2012, 03:50:14 PM by jyhfeei » Logged
Bronica
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #6 on: September 23, 2012, 08:43:04 PM »

I miss not only the OMD. Also Fuji, Samsung and Sigma are still absence.

According to Techradar (using DXO-methods) the OMD-Sensor is overwhelming.

Other tests say, that Fuji can easily  compete with the MARK II or even Mark III.

And there are tests, that say that the Sigma-Foveon surpasses in Raw and low ISO situations all FF-Cams. Not bad for such a camera.

DXOmark tests only the booooooring mainstream - the mass-market. They don't see the real innovations.

That's a absolutely wrong business-strategy, although most earnings come today  from the mass-market. But tomorrow?

Logged
cocute
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19


« Reply #7 on: September 23, 2012, 09:59:00 PM »

DxOMark days ago lost its credibility

The finally test to E-M5 is ridiculous. Is rated very low
« Last Edit: September 24, 2012, 04:42:03 PM by cocute » Logged
DXOMARK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 19


« Reply #8 on: September 24, 2012, 06:07:07 PM »

The tested result for OMD EM5 is BULLSH*T ! ! !

DXOMarks STINKS and lost her credibility  !

There is indeed alot happening behind the scene and payments being made for good camera test results.

The results is falsified especially her high ISO value should be much higher than just 826.

I will blacklist this website from now on !

 Embarrassed Undecided Angry


Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: