If they are going to focus on certain brands (Sony, Nikon, Lumix) and avoid other brands (Fuji, Olympus), then they need to post a news story that justifies their selection process. Their continued silence regarding the X-Pro 1 and E-M5 can only hurt their credibility.
DXO screens the results. To make sponsors happy? Not really RAW data? The way they are screening in silence makes it look like the former. Especially when high performing Nikon/Sony sensors get such high priority. Average performers from Canon, Pany and Oly are also quickly posted. Not one 4/3 sensor was missed until the OM-D.
The data silence is especially ridiculous on the Fuji sensor as it is quite a unique design and from what I see, competes with FF sensors. Wouldn't you figure this sort of data would be interesting to a sensor testing lab?