Forum

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Canon 35L data  (Read 889 times)
Socrates
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 28


« on: November 03, 2012, 06:01:38 PM »

This a comment for <a href="http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/en">this page on the website.

Your measurements are pure nonsense. They show the 35L wide open way softer than the Canon standard for softness: the 50/1.4. Take a look here, or at photozone, etc.:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=121&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=115&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

You also claim that the 35L is softer that the 50L at f/1.2 even if you stop down the 35L a bit. Nonsense again:

http://www.the-digital-picture.com/Reviews/ISO-12233-Sample-Crops.aspx?Lens=121&Camera=453&Sample=0&FLI=0&API=0&LensComp=403&CameraComp=0&FLIComp=0&APIComp=0

BTW, I have first hand experience with all those lenses and own some of them.
« Last Edit: November 03, 2012, 06:39:15 PM by Socrates » Logged
cognoscenti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #1 on: January 03, 2013, 11:00:59 AM »

I agree. 35L is sharper than Nikon, Sony and Zeiss equivalents.

As I own both 35L and 50L, I can say 50L is very sharp as well.
At f/1.4 both are almost equally sharp with 35L leading.
At f/4 roughly the same.

But they are different focal lengths and 50L is the sharpest DSLR 50mm lens. Only Leica 50mm f/1.4 Summilux ASPH is slightly sharper at f/1.4 for 3 times of the price.

35L: http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/148/cat/10

50L: http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1000/cat/10

Leica 50mm: http://slrgear.com/reviews/showproduct.php/product/1503/cat/107/date/1336701679
« Last Edit: January 03, 2013, 11:08:08 AM by cognoscenti » Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines