Quite useless without comparison with Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G VR II

[shieldwulf]

This a comment for this page on the website

It's quite useless without comparison with Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G VR II which, surprisingly, has yet to be reviewed/rated by DxO. What's with the long wait, or worse, DxO do not intend to rate it at all? The Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G VR II is one of the most important lens used by professionals and others, so why no rating? Very, very strange.

[Nicolas]

Good remark, we knew that the 70-200 VR II was missing but we did not want to postponed the publication of the 70-200 f/4.
The 70-200mm VR II is already planed and is currently measured in our labs, measurement should be able in few weeks.

[ageha]

Good remark, we knew that the 70-200 VR II was missing but we did not want to postponed the publication of the 70-200 f/4.
The 70-200mm VR II is already planed and is currently measured in our labs, measurement should be able in few weeks.

Any update on that?

[Emilie_DxOMark]

Hello!

Any update yet you mean?

Best regards,

Emilie

[shieldwulf]

Hi Nicholas,

I'm still waiting for DxOMark to announce test results of the Nikon 70-200 f/2.8G VR II.

Any updates soon? It's been "weeks" as you've said

[Emilie_DxOMark]

Hi,

Thanks for your interest in DxOMark.

As we got a bad-quality copy of this lens, we faced some trouble to test it. So we are currently trying to get a better sample.

But it remains one of our top priority.

Best regards,

The DxOMark team