MOST RELEVANT RESULT(S) FOR :

Forum Twitter Facebook Google + RSS

Author Topic: Compressed RAW vs Uncompressed  (Read 222 times)

Offline deanjohnsonvideo

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Compressed RAW vs Uncompressed
« on: June 16, 2017, 08:00:33 pm »
This a comment for this page on the website
I think its very important to sports photographers that these 2 image qualities be compared. 1 lets you shoot at 20fps and the other at 12. If you are shooting at 12 the A9's advantage over the 1dx mk2 and d5 is gone. I am a 1Dx mk2 owner and if shooting Compressed Raw at 20 fps causes me to take a lower quality picture then the extra 6fps is a downgrade to me.

I did head to head testing with the a9, a7R 2 and 1Dx mk2 and these results fall in line with what my eyes saw. A9 very slightly less noise in blacks than a7R 2 however the sony cameras were very noticably brighter from iso 100 to 3200 than the 1Dx mk2. Could have been their lenses though but I think thats part of the advantage to the system. Lower Tstop on the sony lenses.

Offline Trepverter

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: Compressed RAW vs Uncompressed
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2017, 06:07:10 am »
Totally agree with your comments. When can we see the data from your head to head? Or will you be sharing the RAW files for us to compare? I'm really excited to see your test!